– par Donald Reid and Douglas Bancroft, Canadian Scientific Submersible Facility (CSSF) –
La capacité de la Garde côtière canadienne à soutenir les sciences de la mer au pays, et ce, sur le plan des navires, du temps et des installations disponibles, a diminué et continuera de décliner même après l’entrée en service des nouveaux navires scientifiques, au cours des années à venir.
Nous espérons que cette situation s’améliorera avec l’arrivée, dès 2018, des navires polyvalents de la Marine royale canadienne, assignés à la patrouille extracôtière et arctique.
En ce sens la Canadian Scientific Submersible Facility (OSBL d’exploration sous-marine canadienne) a encouragé les discussions entre la Marine royale canadienne, Pêches et Océans Canada, Ressources naturelles Canada, les universités, le Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en génie, Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada, le Programme des réseaux de centres d’excellence, des organisations non gouvernementales et plusieurs autres groupes connexes. Notre objectif comprend deux volets : la création d’une démonstration-pilote en sciences de la mer de quatre semaines à bord d’un navire de patrouille, et ce, le plus tôt possible, suivie d’un plan quinquennal en matière de science de la mer au Canada, afin d’utiliser pleinement le temps et les installations disponibles à bord des navires de la Marine royale canadienne et de la Garde côtière le long des trois côtes.
Introduction: A New Option for at Sea Canadian Ocean Science?
Increasingly limited access to ship time for Canadian Ocean Science has created difficulties for many years, but is now becoming even more problematic. Most ship time has been provided aboard Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) vessels, which attempts to fulfill its mandate while dealing with the maintenance and coordination problems of operating an aging fleet. Capacity is eroding before replacement. Ships are not being replaced one-for-one. These problems are affecting all three coasts, but are especially notable, and potentially critical, in the Arctic. Reduced availability of CCG ships is a threat to all Canadian Ocean Science researchers who rely on this sea time.
It is suggested that a significant contribution to Canadian Ocean Science could be made by the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) supporting science missions with ship time and facilities aboard the soon to be launched HARRY DEWOLF-Class Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ships (AOPSs) with delivery of up to six vessels scheduled to begin in 2018.
We hope that government leadership in ocean science, specifically Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) ADM Science, and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) ADM Lands and Minerals, will be convinced that this is a sound idea worth evaluating with a pilot project conducted in the summer of 2019. The potential availability of time and facilities aboard these ships will hopefully lead to Canadian Ocean Science academics developing collaborations with DFO and NRCan scientists to take advantage of any available ship time.
Access to reliable CCG ship time for ocean scientists has been steadily declining for years. There are several key causes; a science support fleet that has been aging for decades, DFO Ocean Science structural deficits, and slowly declining Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Ship Time Allocation Committee (STAC) funding. These problems have recently begun to accelerate on all three coasts.
Concurrently, demand for ocean science support has been increasing and is likely to continue to do so. For instance, growing pressure to establish new Marine Protected Areas on all coasts will require extensive ocean science studies to identify optimum locations. Once established, longer-term monitoring programs will be required to demonstrate and ensure their levels of effectiveness.
While new science-capable ships are currently being constructed for the CCG, there will be significant loss of capacity in the interim, until all the required replacement vessels are in service. It should also be noted that any CCG ships assigned to science missions are periodically re-assigned to real world Search and Rescue and other tasking, displacing science missions. Current challenges by region include:
Atlantic: CCG ships that support science have been retired, or are close to retiring, and are increasingly not available for ocean science service. Examples include:
- CCGS ALFRED NEEDLER – 35 years old, suffered a significant engine room fire in 2003;
- CCGS WILFRED TEMPLEMAN – in service for 27 years, removed from service in 2008; and
- CCGS HUDSON – 54 years old, first Canadian purpose-built ocean research ship, in refit since December 2016.
Pacific: One key CCG ship that has supported ocean science has just retired, leaving little other capability, especially for fisheries science. Examples include:
- CCGS W. E. RICKER – 39 years old (31 years in government service) and no longer sea worthy, removed from service in March 2017; and
- CCGS TULLY – 33 years old, entering a life extension refit creating some uncertainty as there is little alternative west coast science capacity.
Arctic: Activity in the Arctic is increasing and expanding our ocean science presence is crucial. CCG ships include:
- CCGS AMUNDSEN has been key. A capable ship but greatly oversubscribed and limited to deploying a relatively small Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) by her “moon pool”, and limited available deck space. She is 39 years old and approaching a refit (originally refitted to support Arctic science in 2003, service refit in 2012);
- CCGS LOUIS ST-LAURENT is 51 years old, conducted sea-floor mapping in 2016;
- CCGS SIR WILFRED LAURIER is 32 years old, involved in the search that found Franklin’s HMS EREBUS in 2014, limited science capacity.
With the RCN taking delivery of up to six ice-capable AOPSs (or Arctic and Offshore Patrol Vessels; AOPVs) starting in 2018, new ocean science platforms may become available.
The AOPS’s mandate will include:
- conducting armed sea-borne surveillance of all three of our coasts;
- providing situational awareness of activities and events; and
- cooperating with other government departments in supporting their mandates, as required.
The last statement means that if DFO and NRCan (and other departments) request support from the RCN for ocean science, this could be made available “as opportunity allows”. In addition, they could also support academic ocean science missions if those scientists were in collaboration with DFO (possibly through their Partnership Program) and/or NRCan researchers.
Key AOPS technical factors:
- Length: 103 metres. Beam: 19 metres. Crew: 65;
- Displacement: 6,440 tonnes;
- Dozens of empty bunks (for soldiers, special forces, etc.);
- Considerable upper deck space for six 20-foot containers, space on the flight deck for ROVs and/or Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs, including gliders);
- A 20-tonne crane to self-load/unload payloads, instruments, ROVs, etc.;
- Helicopter and drone capability;
- Two 4.5-megawatt main engines, powered by four 3.6 megawatt generators; and
- Bow thrusters for dynamic positioning.
Highly versatile, AOPSs could become outstanding ocean science vessels of opportunity. This belief could be easily tested in a four-week trial deployment in 2019. As an example, the following could be readily embarked:
- Up to two dozen scientists and support staff;
- Containerised labs and equipment;
- The ROV Remotely Operated Platform for Ocean Science (ROPOS; Canadian Scientific Submersible Facility (CSSF));
- HUGIN AUV (ULaval); and
- AUV Gliders (Dalhousie, UBC).
Benefits for the RCN/Canadian Forces
These ships, outfitted with appropriate research equipment including state-of-the-art ROVs and/or AUVs, could also provide a comprehensive deep seabed intervention capability for the RCN that has been lacking for decades, as well as the opportunity to maintain continuing experience in this and related fields. It would restore RCN expertise and develop experience with deep seabed intervention operations.
This opportunity could also be used to restore RCN experience with deep sea Search and Recovery, and provide a contingency seabed intervention capability.
While supporting DFO and NRCan ocean science, Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) could also exploit this capability to install experimental moored arrays and other RD projects in direct support of RCN capability improvement.
CSSF has been supporting this initiative in discussions at all levels of DFO, NRCan, and RCN; as well as with academic scientists, NSERC and DRDC, and will continue to do so. A current priority is the development of a four-week ocean science demonstration trial aboard an AOPS operating out of Halifax, NS as soon as possible after the completion of ship trials.
This entire process could be initiated if the DFO ADM Science and NRCan ADM Lands and Minerals were able to meet with The Commander of the RCN to develop and sign a formal Memorandum of Understanding among the three groups. DFO and NRCan would then be able to have their scientists assemble consortia of ocean science research groups that would include university academics, NSERC and DRDC.
Led by DFO and NRCan, these groups could then work together to develop a five-year proposed Canadian Ocean Science plan with full participation by academics, DRDC, and interested NGOs. Recognised Networks of Centres of Excellence (NCEs) and related entities including the Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR), Ocean Networks Canada, Takuvik, ArcticNet and the Ocean Frontier Institute should also be engaged and may in fact wish to play a key science leadership role. Participation of the DFO Partnership Fund and NSERC STAC would be critical for the funding of mission-related incremental costs.
CSSF is not alone in recognizing this problem and envisioning solutions. Of note, a team of academics led by MEOPAR Scientific Director Douglas Wallace have developed a concept known as Modular Ocean Research Vessels (MORV). MORV will use existing, non-specialized vessels to embark science teams with containerised labs and support modules. They have identified several candidate ships in Halifax and St John’s and are working to further develop this concept, with a trial expedition, using a platform supply vessel, as early as August/September 2018 to test both MORV and AOPS concept of operations while conducting quality ocean science. Science would include various water column and seafloor biogeochemistry and monitoring studies with a ROPOS mission focusing on deep ocean microbiology studying hydrocarbon-degrading microbes.
The ability of the CCG to support Canadian Ocean Science is continuing to decline and significant shortfalls will still occur after delivery of the new science ships. Any ship time “as opportunity allows” that may become available aboard an RCN AOPS could and should to be fully exploited to achieve their full mandate while promoting all possible aspects of Canadian Ocean Science.
The future is what we make it.
About the Authors: Douglas Bancroft and Donald Reid
Douglas Bancroft is a former Commanding Officer of several RCN ships, who has also enjoyed three decades in senior leadership positions in DFO, Environment Canada (EC) and NRCan science. He is currently President and CEO of the Canadian Scientific Submersible Facility (CSSF). He has observed first hand the alarming and accelerating decline of CGG capacity to support Canadian ocean science over the last decade, and developed this concept as an option to substantially mitigate this situation.
Donald Reid has worked in ocean sciences for more than four decades as a marine/aquatic biologist studying coral reefs, crustacean reproduction, fisheries management, and the transport and control of aquatic invasive species. He has been a co-ordinator/advisor for various programs and projects with EC, DFO and TC, including the CCG.